A disturbing account of fundamentalism’s lethal power.
A gritty account of the terrorist siege on a Russian elementary school in 2004.
First-time author Phillips traveled to the former Soviet Union to study the events of that fateful September day, when a small group of Chechen nationalists and Islamic extremists attacked School No. 1 in the small Russian town of Beslan. During a traditional service entitled the “Ceremony of the First Bell”—in which first year students, proud parents and grandparents and returning pupils gathered in the school courtyard to perform songs and dances—gunfire erupted as balloons were released into the air. A group of terrorists led by Ruslan Khuchbarov stormed the courtyard, gunning down anyone attempting to flee before herding the men, women and children into a small gymnasium. Interviews from survivors recount in graphic detail the events that followed during the next three days as more than 1,200 people were held captive. As a bumbling police force assembled outside the school with rounds of blanks instead of real bullets, female suicide bombers detonated their bombs in an attempt to kill the men and eliminate any chance of a resistance. Meanwhile, the terrorists threatened to shoot any child who attempted to drink water from the bathroom taps, and all the while the negotiating had yet to even begin. Using a hostage to write their demands on a piece of paper and deliver it to the police, the terrorists called for several high-ranking individuals to be brought in, with the hopes of pressuring the unwavering Russian government to pull its troops from Chechnya and declare it a free and independent nation. Phillips provides a thorough history of the sectarian divide that has gripped the region over the past century and details the events that led to the siege. The author navigates between past and present, offering the reader a reflective look at the event in question. But the constant shift between the crisis and its historical buildup dissipates the sense of urgency and tension as the situation becomes increasingly dire.
A disturbing account of fundamentalism’s lethal power.Pub Date: Feb. 1, 2008
ISBN: 978-1-86207-927-4
Page Count: 224
Publisher: Granta UK/Trafalgar
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2007
BOOK REVIEW
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...
A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.
Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016
ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6
Page Count: 248
Publisher: Random House
Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015
PERSPECTIVES
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
