Next book

WHY WE TALK FUNNY

THE REAL STORY BEHIND OUR ACCENTS

Smart pop-science writing, inviting and well-researched.

A sprightly and informed study of accents, their evolution, and social purpose.

Fridland, a professor of linguistics at the University of Nevada (Like, Literally, Dude: Arguing for the Good in Bad English, 2023) takes a playful approach to exploring accents without diminishing academic rigor. Her main focus is on the linguistic and social fluidity of accents, which typically develop to establish preferred in-group behavior. “Social triggers are the crucial force behind language change,” she writes, noting that the esteem of a particular pronunciation depends a lot on context; for instance, dropped “h”s that are heard as low-class in English (think: Eliza Doolittle) were actually signs of high-class language in ancient Rome. She presents plenty of evidence that accents feed into social prejudices; one study showed how people are more likely to say someone is harder to understand when they’re informed a speaker is Asian, even if the speaker is not. Not all of Fridland’s explorations are so fraught: She goes deep on why so many dislike the word moist, and strange ways that even simple words like dog evolve into broader or narrower meanings. She’ll occasionally deploy some deliberately groan-worthy jokes to get her point across, but eases up when the subject matter gets more serious: A well-done chapter of African American Vernacular English explores how certain words and phrases that are often seen as degraded (see: axe for ask) are the inheritance of a preferred pronunciation of the word in the colonial slaveholding South. Now that Americans process more information online, the impact of place and history on how we speak is evolving, and Fridland revels in the complications, driving home her main point: “the idea there exists only one ‘right’ way to sound is both historically and linguistically misguided.”

Smart pop-science writing, inviting and well-researched.

Pub Date: April 21, 2026

ISBN: 9780593830482

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Viking

Review Posted Online: Feb. 16, 2026

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 15, 2026

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 50


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

THE GREATEST SENTENCE EVER WRITTEN

A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 50


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Words that made a nation.

Isaacson is known for expansive biographies of great thinkers (and Elon Musk), but here he pens a succinct, stimulating commentary on the Founding Fathers’ ode to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” His close reading of the Declaration of Independence’s second sentence, published to mark the 250th anniversary of the document’s adoption, doesn’t downplay its “moral contradiction.” Thomas Jefferson enslaved hundreds of people yet called slavery “a cruel war against human nature” in his first draft of the Declaration. All but 15 of the document’s 56 signers owned enslaved people. While the sentence in question asserted “all men are created equal” and possess “unalienable rights,” the Founders “consciously and intentionally” excluded women, Native Americans, and enslaved people. And yet the sentence is powerful, Isaacson writes, because it names a young nation’s “aspirations.” He mounts a solid defense of what ought to be shared goals, among them economic fairness, “moral compassion,” and a willingness to compromise. “Democracy depends on this,” he writes. Isaacson is excellent when explaining how Enlightenment intellectuals abroad influenced the founders. Benjamin Franklin, one of the Declaration’s “five-person drafting committee,” stayed in David Hume’s home for a month in the early 1770s, “discussing ideas of natural rights” with the Scottish philosopher. Also strong is Isaacson’s discussion of the “edits and tweaks” made to Jefferson’s draft. As recommended by Franklin and others, the changes were substantial, leaving Jefferson “distraught.” Franklin, who emerges as the book’s hero, helped establish municipal services, founded a library, and encouraged religious diversity—the kind of civic-mindedness that we could use more of today, Isaacson reminds us.

A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.

Pub Date: Nov. 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781982181314

Page Count: 80

Publisher: Simon & Schuster

Review Posted Online: Aug. 29, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 1, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview