Next book

THE AI PARADOX

HOW TO MAKE SENSE OF A COMPLEX FUTURE

A nuanced, hopeful vision of a future with human intelligence amplified, not overwhelmed, by machine intelligence.

In this optimistic take, the seductive skills of AI systems are pitted against the complexity of human intelligence.

Will unchecked adoption of artificial intelligence overwhelm society? This book offers a reassuring counterpoint: AI’s limitations remain stark when compared with the richness of human intelligence. Dignum, professor of responsible artificial intelligence at Umeå University in Sweden, challenges the popular image of AI as an all-powerful brain. Organizing her chapters around a series of “paradoxes,” she argues: “The more AI can do, the more it reveals what makes human intelligence unique.” The author begins by examining conflicting definitions of machine intelligence. Weaving together research across fields is no simple feat, given the fragmented and varied AI landscape. Drawing on her experience in both corporate and academic settings, she observes that enthusiasm and anxiety abound, yet consensus is elusive—not only on what AI is, but also on the meaning of artificial general intelligence. Pushing back against doomsday scenarios, she contends that while skeptics such as Yoshua Bengio warn of catastrophic risks, AI systems lack humanlike motives, drives, and multidimensional intelligence. Instead of framing AI as an unstoppable force poised to subjugate humanity, Dignum encourages us to see it as an augmenting technology we can shape. The book is dense with thought-provoking intersections that could be expanded into another volume. Dignum situates AI within cultural, scientific, and corporate currents, though her analysis gives less attention to the crucial role of government funding in shaping the field, including the notorious “AI winters” when investment dried up after overhyped promises. Acknowledging that prominent AI pioneers have raised alarms, Dignum counters: “We should be more concerned about those who develop, own and deploy these systems.”

A nuanced, hopeful vision of a future with human intelligence amplified, not overwhelmed, by machine intelligence.

Pub Date: Feb. 17, 2026

ISBN: 9780691269085

Page Count: 224

Publisher: Princeton Univ.

Review Posted Online: Oct. 10, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2025

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 71


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

THE GREATEST SENTENCE EVER WRITTEN

A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 71


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Words that made a nation.

Isaacson is known for expansive biographies of great thinkers (and Elon Musk), but here he pens a succinct, stimulating commentary on the Founding Fathers’ ode to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” His close reading of the Declaration of Independence’s second sentence, published to mark the 250th anniversary of the document’s adoption, doesn’t downplay its “moral contradiction.” Thomas Jefferson enslaved hundreds of people yet called slavery “a cruel war against human nature” in his first draft of the Declaration. All but 15 of the document’s 56 signers owned enslaved people. While the sentence in question asserted “all men are created equal” and possess “unalienable rights,” the Founders “consciously and intentionally” excluded women, Native Americans, and enslaved people. And yet the sentence is powerful, Isaacson writes, because it names a young nation’s “aspirations.” He mounts a solid defense of what ought to be shared goals, among them economic fairness, “moral compassion,” and a willingness to compromise. “Democracy depends on this,” he writes. Isaacson is excellent when explaining how Enlightenment intellectuals abroad influenced the founders. Benjamin Franklin, one of the Declaration’s “five-person drafting committee,” stayed in David Hume’s home for a month in the early 1770s, “discussing ideas of natural rights” with the Scottish philosopher. Also strong is Isaacson’s discussion of the “edits and tweaks” made to Jefferson’s draft. As recommended by Franklin and others, the changes were substantial, leaving Jefferson “distraught.” Franklin, who emerges as the book’s hero, helped establish municipal services, founded a library, and encouraged religious diversity—the kind of civic-mindedness that we could use more of today, Isaacson reminds us.

A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.

Pub Date: Nov. 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781982181314

Page Count: 80

Publisher: Simon & Schuster

Review Posted Online: Aug. 29, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 1, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview