Reconstructing Marlene’s malfeasance makes for a pleasant puzzle, but the real pleasure here is time spent with the less...
A woman confronts suspicious circumstances surrounding her mother’s death 14 years earlier.
Mattison, known for her unusual structures, has bifurcated her latest novel (The Wedding of the Two-Headed Woman, 2004, etc.), which alternates between 1989 and 2003. In 1989, Con, 45, is babysitting her 70-something mother Gert’s cat in Gert’s Brooklyn apartment while Gert is visiting her friend Marlene. Marlene and Gert’s friendship dates back to World War II, during which, as Con learns from perusing her mother’s old correspondence, Marlene manipulated Gert into investing in a black-market racket run by Marlene’s mobster boyfriend Lou. Con’s husband Jerry, who travels solo to research historical arcana, is visiting Fort Ticonderoga, and Con is miffed that her teen daughter Joanna has accompanied Jerry, who’s never asked Con along on one of his expeditions. The irascible, imperious Marlene calls repeatedly, urging Con to let her assume power of attorney for Gert, who, she claims, is losing her faculties. One night, Marlene informs Con that Gert died in her sleep. In shock, Con overlooks the smoking guns, including Marlene’s failure to call 911, Marlene’s insistence that Con hand over Gert’s financial records, the fact that Marlene, a vet assistant, is handy with a euthanasia needle and especially the fact that Marlene had somehow been appointed Gert’s executor in place of Gert’s two daughters. By 2003, Con recalls these events—except for the profound dislocation wrought by her mother’s death—only in blurred fragments. She’s long divorced from Jerry, and feisty Joanna has won a fellowship to intern with a womanizing sculptor. Marlene, Con’s friend Peggy, Joanna and Jerry (researching an abortive Brooklyn train project) are all converging on her for the weekend. Although Con has forgotten her misgivings about Marlene, Joanna has not. Joanna suspects Marlene did more than merely siphon money from Gert, and she sets out to learn more.
Reconstructing Marlene’s malfeasance makes for a pleasant puzzle, but the real pleasure here is time spent with the less flamboyant characters as they cope with more mundane upsets.Pub Date: Sept. 16, 2008
ISBN: 978-0-06-143055-8
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Perennial/HarperCollins
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2008
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.
Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).
A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.Pub Date: June 16, 2020
ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine
Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK TO SCREEN
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.
A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.
"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019
ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Celadon Books
Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
