Next book

In the Shreds of Reality

NAMELESS

While its style falls short of its substance, this globe-trotting sci-fi tale has intrigue to spare.

In this first installment of a projected trilogy, a nameless man risks waking up in the body of a new person every time he falls asleep.

When readers first meet the hero of this story, he has woken up with a hangover, despite no memory of having touched a drop of alcohol. This is because his consciousness has been transported into the body of a drunken French architect named Pierre Diemon. This isn’t the first time—as long as he can remember, he has found himself inhabiting the bodies of different people around the world for short periods of time. Whether he is an underground boxer in Toronto, a homeless man–turned–business tycoon in New York, or a philosophy professor in Moscow, he abides by a code of conduct: no matter how brief the time he spends in control of their bodies, he strives to improve the lives of his hosts. That all changes when he meets a woman like him for the first time. This woman, currently inhabiting a Russian student named Katya, lives a life free of rules and restrictions, treating her time in each host as a party as opposed to a calling. When the hero falls in love with Katya, he begins to question whether his strict code of ethics is truly one to live by. Debut author Mart manages to keep readers from becoming overly confused, even though his hero’s name changes multiple times throughout the novel. Much of the prose is too flowery, with attempts at metaphors that try to say something deep about human existence and end up sounding forced: “If fate really does exist, she’s still that same evil ex she’s always been. And when it came to the hero, she had a whole wing of her mansion renovated as a playroom for his identity stocked full of all sorts of malicious toys.” Despite the heavy-handed style, the concept of shifting back and forth through different people’s lives, and the debate over the responsibility one should feel for those individuals, has appeal.

While its style falls short of its substance, this globe-trotting sci-fi tale has intrigue to spare.

Pub Date: March 25, 2016

ISBN: N/A

Page Count: 263

Publisher: CreateSpace

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2016

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 555


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 555


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 140


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 140


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview