Next book

SCHOLARIUM

Not quite The Name of the Rose, to which comparison is inevitable, but most entertaining and engrossing nevertheless.

The combative world of 15th-century scholarship is a hotbed of murder and intrigue in this vivid German debut, the work of a former student of medieval philosophy.

Gross’s lavish plot turns on the killing of Frederico Cassall, a Master of Liberal Arts at the recently founded University of Cologne. The despotic Cassall is known to have physically abused his young wife Sophie, an educated woman who had taken the impermissible liberty of reading her husband’s books. But Sophie is one of several suspects, along with wealthy student Domitian von Semper, his mild-mannered friend Laurien Thibold, and arrogant young Master Siger Lombardi, a “godless” nominalist mightily disapproved of by his colleagues, who are disciples of Thomas Aquinas and believers in the reality of ideal forms. Gross moves skillfully among the viewpoints of these and other characters, most notably Marius De Swerthe, the university’s stern, dwarflike Prior, and veteran Master Konrad Steiner, who undertakes to unmask Cassall’s murderer by solving the riddle contained in a mocking message left with the body. Another murder, licentious rituals performed by a heretical religious sect devoted to the “sacrum sexualae,” and Sophie’s impersonation of a male student propel Gross’s narrative along (though we never really believe Sophie’s disguise could have escaped detection). In an unusual double climax, the murderer’s dabblings in forbidden knowledge precipitate his undoing, and Sophie’s attempt to enter a sphere reserved exclusively for men leads to her trial for sorcery. Scholarium is a little too long, and suffers from redundancy (e.g., Gross hits us over the head with the relevance of the scholastic dispute between the realist acceptance of ideality and the nominalist belief that “objects alone possessed reality”). But we keep turning the pages, and they don’t disappoint.

Not quite The Name of the Rose, to which comparison is inevitable, but most entertaining and engrossing nevertheless.

Pub Date: June 30, 2004

ISBN: 1-59264-056-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Toby Press

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 2004

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 529


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 529


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 119


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 119


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview