Next book

THE PURE AND THE IMPURE

A seductively crafted and deeply fallible work—and a classic.

An exquisite new translation of the volume Colette referred to, on multiple occasions, as “my best book.”

A narrator who resembles her author both in name and occupation guides readers through the sexual proclivities and shades of gender expression that populated belle epoque Paris (with a brief digression to Georgian-era Wales). In cafes, cabarets, and opium dens, she introduces us to what translator Careau calls “the sexual underworld”: lesbians and gay men, women who dress in men’s clothing, a sneering, misogynist Don Juan, and others—many of whom wouldn’t have used the same language to describe themselves that we use now. (Careau believes that at least one of those cross-dressing women would likely have been a transgender man if she’d lived in our own time.) And as Careau notes in her informative if occasionally stiff foreword, the book itself evades categorization of all sorts—it’s neither pure fiction nor nonfiction, and that narrator is a lot coyer than Colette’s own life might lead us to believe. For periods of time, Colette dressed in men’s clothing and took women lovers, but you wouldn’t know it based on this account alone. Her descriptions can seem harshly—even cruelly—outdated: Of a circle of gay men, she writes, “I will carefully avoid saying that they were not manly.” Of the cross-dressing women, she accepts without complaint this question from an interlocutor: “What’s more ridiculous, and sadder, than a…simulated man?” But it’s never entirely clear where Colette’s irony ends and her sincerity begins—nor who might be considered “pure” or “impure.” As Careau notes, Colette’s work would have been wildly broad-minded at the time—and for the most part, her tone is more sympathetic than cutting, eager to unravel the many, many different layers of “my favorite form of brutality, love.” As a whole, it’s best read not as a comprehensive guide to gender and sexual desire but as a singular account—one that was very much of its own time and yet, paradoxically, far out in front of it.

A seductively crafted and deeply fallible work—and a classic.

Pub Date: July 7, 2026

ISBN: 9781324075233

Page Count: 176

Publisher: Norton

Review Posted Online: June 15, 2026

Kirkus Reviews Issue: yesterday

Categories:

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 104


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

THE CALAMITY CLUB

Fans of Stockett’s bestselling debut will love this engaging follow-up.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 104


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Stockett heads to Mississippi for another historical novel about feisty women.

This time, perhaps recalling criticisms of cultural appropriation in The Help (2009), she sticks to feisty white women, with one exception. The setting is Oxford in 1933. For two miserable years, 11-year-old Meg has lived in “the Orphan,” a county asylum for parentless girls. Chairlady Garnett—a villain so one-note she’d twirl a mustache if she had one—makes it her mission to ostracize the older girls she deems unadoptable, stigmatizing them as offspring of the “feebleminded” mothers who abandoned them. She particularly has it in for smart, sassy Meg, who refuses to believe her mother’s mysterious disappearance was deliberate. Elsewhere in Oxford, Birdie Calhoun comes to visit her sister Frances, who married a wealthy banker, to ask for money on behalf of their mother and grandmother back in Footely. Frances isn’t thrilled by this reminder of her impoverished small-town origins. But she’s trying to climb up in Oxford society by volunteering at the Orphan, the asylum’s books need to be done before the state inspector shows up in a few weeks, and Birdie is a bookkeeper. Having neatly arranged to keep Birdie in town and draw these two storylines together, Stockett goes on to spin a compulsively readable yarn with enough plot for a half-dozen novels. Birdie and Meg become friends, Meg is adopted despite Garnett’s best efforts, Meg’s mother turns up at the Orphan demanding to know where her child is—and that’s less than a quarter of the way through a long, winding narrative that keeps piling on more dramatic developments until all loose ends are neatly, if hastily, wrapped up in the final pages. Stockett might be making a point about Southern women facing facts and standing up for themselves, but mostly this is just a satisfyingly twisty tale that should make a great miniseries.

Fans of Stockett’s bestselling debut will love this engaging follow-up.

Pub Date: May 5, 2026

ISBN: 9781954118812

Page Count: 656

Publisher: Spiegel & Grau

Review Posted Online: Feb. 2, 2026

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2026

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 30


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

WHISTLER

An evocative and moving tribute to the death-defying, heart-opening, infinitely redemptive power of storytelling.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 30


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

A chance meeting in a museum unlocks a long-closed door in a family’s past.

Of a piece with her last three novels—Commonwealth (2016), The Dutch House (2019), and Tom Lake (2023)—Patchett’s latest explores the evolution of families over time, romantic secrets, and step-relationships, again giving these topics the wry and tender treatment that is distinctively hers. As it begins, Daphne Fuller’s attentive husband, Jonathan, notices that a man has been following them through the Metropolitan Museum of Art. At first they chalk it up to the fact that “old guys love [Daphne],” as she told Jonathan decades ago, a notion he has held onto "like a souvenir postcard from another era." But it turns out that, though Daphne doesn’t recognize him, Eddie Triplett is her former stepfather. Like the author herself, as recalled in her 2020 essay “Three Fathers,” Daphne has had three dads. Her biological father, a deep-sea fisherman named Buddy Zabriskie, left the family early; her current stepfather, Lucas Ekker, lives with her mother in retirement in Massachusetts. Ekker is an unprepossessing sort Abby met working as the publicist for his self-help books, Positivity!, Positively Positive!, The Positivity Workbook!, Positive Every Day!, ad infinitum. The man in the museum, Eddie Triplett, was also someone her mother met through her job in publishing, and once Daphne realizes who he is, she remembers that “[their] hearts were forever stitched together.” This is because Daphne and Eddie were in a serious car accident when she was 9 years old, after which her mother immediately divorced him and evicted him from their lives. The details of that accident—among them lies the reason the novel is named after a horse called Whistler—are gradually wheedled out of Daphne by her younger sister, Leda, a clinical psychologist in New York and a reliable source of insight on the narrative’s key issues. “‘You make it sound like I’ve been keeping all this from you, but I’m not,’ [Daphne] said. ‘Who goes through life thinking about what happened when they were nine?’ ‘It’s all people think about,’ Leda said.”

An evocative and moving tribute to the death-defying, heart-opening, infinitely redemptive power of storytelling.

Pub Date: June 2, 2026

ISBN: 9780063511637

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Harper/HarperCollins

Review Posted Online: April 6, 2026

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 2026

Close Quickview