Intriguing, maddening, novel, inspiring, romantic, and hopelessly utopian.

READ REVIEW

AMERICA’S UNDECLARED WAR

WHAT’S KILLING OUR CITIES AND HOW WE CAN STOP IT

A brisk assessment of the ills of the American city with suggested remedies that range from problematic to quixotic.

Lazare enjoys slaughtering sacred cows. In The Frozen Republic (1996), he developed in full a theme that reappears here—viz., “Democratic theory has advanced beyond the archaic ideas propounded by the Founding Fathers in the 1780s.” He traces a basic and enduring conflict in American political thought to the differences between Thomas Jefferson (whose loyalties were to the plantation society in which he flourished) and Alexander Hamilton (whom Lazare terms “a thoroughgoing urbanist”). The author proceeds chronologically through what he identifies as three major urban crises, the most deleterious of which was precipitated by what he calls “Fordism”—the creation by Henry Ford of an automobile economy that encouraged flight to the suburbs, where today millions live boring, wasteful, materialistic lives, subsidized by government tax policies that unfairly favor home and automobile ownership, widen the gap between the haves and the have-nots, and make both the cities and the suburbs unlivable. Although such a portrait of urban blight and suburban sprawl is not new, it is nonetheless powerful, and Lazare’s assaults on the economy of consumption and waste are effective. Less convincing are his remedies. He argues that the country must somehow decide that urban living is preferable to suburban, that conservation is better than consumption, and that individuals must surrender chunks of their individual liberty to improve the commonweal. He envisions Americans who will travel by high-speed train, walk to the grocery store, pay $10 a gallon for gasoline, live in reinvigorated urban environments—and, presumably, vote for politicians who promise higher taxes, fewer cars, and overall austerity.

Intriguing, maddening, novel, inspiring, romantic, and hopelessly utopian.

Pub Date: May 1, 2001

ISBN: 0-15-100552-4

Page Count: 384

Publisher: Harcourt

Review Posted Online: May 20, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 2001

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

Google Rating

  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • Kirkus Reviews'
    Best Books Of 2016

  • New York Times Bestseller

  • Pulitzer Prize Finalist

WHEN BREATH BECOMES AIR

A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.

Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.

Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016

ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6

Page Count: 248

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: Sept. 30, 2015

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet
more