Next book

COOL RULES

ANATOMY OF AN ATTITUDE

Much that is Coolish, some merely foolish. (50 b&w illustrations)

A breezy account of “the concept of Cool” attempting to use it “to explain the evolution of popular culture over the last 50 years.”

Former magazine editor Pountain and freelance journalist Robins believe that Cool (capitalized throughout) has emerged as “a cultural category in its own right” and is now “the dominant mindset of advanced consumer capitalism.” They rely on the work of historian Robert Farris Thompson in a perfunctory effort to trace the phenomenon “right back to the ancient civilizations of West Africa,” but their real interest is popular culture in the late 20th century. (Attempts to link Cool with the placid attitudes of toreadors, Samurai, and Renaissance Italian aristocrats are even more tenuous, and the discussion of Cool in 18th- and 19th-century Britain occupies a single paragraph.) Cool is “an emotional style that belongs to the modern age,” the authors argue, a stance that would be more convincing if their definition of Cool were not continually shifting: it is at various points “a permanent state of private rebellion,” an attitude “profoundly hedonistic” (with underlying violence), “an effortlessness of technique [in athletics], concealing a fierce . . . competitiveness,” etc. Seeking firmer intellectual grounding, Pountain and Robins sometimes quote Norman Mailer, Susan Sontag, and other heavier-weights. But they are most comfortable in the world of the popular, and their comments about Cool in clothing, art, music, and movies are most convincing (notably in a brisk analysis of the failure of Levi Strauss to keep pace with blue-jean fashions), although it is most unCool to misquote Dirty Harry, whose celebrated request, “Go ahead, make my day,” they unintentionally alter. The authors are better at raising questions than answering them, so the locution “still awaits a truly adequate analysis” appears in various guises throughout. They seem, as well, to have a Starr-struck interest in President Clinton’s sex life; references to the Monica Lewinsky affair appear regularly. A chart illustrating Cool’s thousand-year evolution is more risible than instructive.

Much that is Coolish, some merely foolish. (50 b&w illustrations)

Pub Date: Oct. 1, 2000

ISBN: 1-86189-071-0

Page Count: 192

Publisher: N/A

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 2000

Categories:
Next book

INSIDE AMERICAN EDUCATION

THE DECLINE, THE DECEPTION, THE DOGMAS

American schools at every level, from kindergarten to postgraduate programs, have substituted ideological indoctrination for education, charges conservative think-tanker Sowell (Senior Fellow/Hoover Institution; Preferential Polices, 1990, etc.) in this aggressive attack on the contemporary educational establishment. Sowell's quarrel with "values clarification" programs (like sex education, death-sensitizing, and antiwar "brainwashing") isn't that he disagrees with their positions but, rather, that they divert time and resources from the kind of training in intellectual analysis that makes students capable of reasoning for themselves. Contending that the values clarification programs inspired by his archvillain, psychotherapist Carl Rogers, actually inculcate values confusion, Sowell argues that the universal demand for relevance and sensitivity to the whole student has led public schools to abdicate their responsibility to such educational ideals as experience and maturity. On the subject of higher education, Sowell moves to more familiar ground, ascribing the declining quality of classroom instruction to the insatiable appetite of tangentially related research budgets and bloated athletic programs (to which an entire chapter, largely irrelevant to the book's broader argument, is devoted). The evidence offered for these propositions isn't likely to change many minds, since it's so inveterately anecdotal (for example, a call for more stringent curriculum requirements is bolstered by the news that Brooke Shields graduated from Princeton without taking any courses in economics, math, biology, chemistry, history, sociology, or government) and injudiciously applied (Sowell's dismissal of student evaluations as responsible data in judging a professor's classroom performance immediately follows his use of comments from student evaluations to document the general inadequacy of college teaching). All in all, the details of Sowell's indictment—that not only can't Johnny think, but "Johnny doesn't know what thinking is"—are more entertaining than persuasive or new.

Pub Date: Jan. 4, 1993

ISBN: 0-02-930330-3

Page Count: 400

Publisher: Free Press

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 1, 1992

Categories:
Next book

THE ABOLITION OF MAN

The sub-title of this book is "Reflections on Education with Special Reference to the Teaching of English in the Upper Forms of Schools." But one finds in it little about education, and less about the teaching of English. Nor is this volume a defense of the Christian faith similar to other books from the pen of C. S. Lewis. The three lectures comprising the book are rather rambling talks about life and literature and philosophy. Those who have come to expect from Lewis penetrating satire and a subtle sense of humor, used to buttress a real Christian faith, will be disappointed.

Pub Date: April 8, 1947

ISBN: 1609421477

Page Count: -

Publisher: Macmillan

Review Posted Online: Oct. 17, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: April 1, 1947

Categories:
Close Quickview