A study brimming with altruism but lacking in technical sophistication and analytical thoroughness.
Liu’s fourth book is a spirited argument for the global adoption of universal basic income as a means to relieve the economic inequalities of capitalism.
As the author, a retired research biochemist, points out, a version of a universal basic income was first proposed by Thomas Paine in 1817 and has again become a hot political topic since Andrew Yang made it the centerpiece of his presidential campaign in 2020. The crux of the idea is alluringly simple: a uniform sum of money is directly disbursed monthly to every citizen above a certain age, a payment that is entirely unconditional and enough to ensure an individual’s basic needs. According to the author, UBI is necessary as a corrective to our “world of miseries,” which includes the rise of crushing poverty, suicide, crime, homelessness, and mass incarceration. Liu’s worldview is hyperbolically bleak: “The present state of civilization is as odious as it is unjust.” For Liu, the principal culprit of this pervasive wretchedness is capitalism, a form of systematic selfishness that “has generated the Poverty that we observe worldwide to this day.” The author argues that UBI is easily implementable given the sophisticated banking technology available today and that it could be easily financed by making strategic cuts to wasteful spending. Moreover, he furnishes powerful evidence that UBI would not undermine economic incentives; in fact, he cites numerous studies and pilot programs that suggest the exact opposite. The central strength of Liu’s study is his foursquare confrontation with the classic objections to UBI: its cost and the possibility that it will sabotage people’s will to work. He adds a moral argument as well: UBI is a basic human right and a necessary response to the inequalities predictably produced by capitalistic competition—which is so often fundamentally unfair.
Yet the author is not an economist, and this lack of technical expertise shows in the way he glosses over so many complex details. For example, he never argues convincingly for the fiscal viability of UBI—he simply assumes its efficacy. Moreover, he is indifferent to the many ways in which UBI might impact different economies of scale across vastly different cultures. Liu’s characterization of capitalism is closer to political sloganeering than a philosophically rigorous critique; he completely ignores capitalism’s power, for all its real shortcomings, to lift people out of poverty. Liu’s monograph is less a scholarly study than an impassioned manifesto; as a result, he has a tendency to exaggerate. For example, he claims UBI is a “panacea” for all that ails the world, a declaration as dubious as it is unsubstantiated. Similarly, he claims it will establish a “paradise on earth” and embodies the essence of Daoism (“Dao prevailing in the world,” as he deems it). The author dismisses all counterargument in his claim that it’s “criminal for anyone to oppose Universal Basic Income payment.” For all its real virtues—Liu makes many reasonable and even persuasive arguments—this is not a rigorous enough examination of UBI and fails to confront the great complexity of its advantages and disadvantages. A study brimming with altruism but lacking in technical sophistication and analytical thoroughness.Pub Date: Nov. 13, 2022
ISBN: 9789811859953
Page Count: 188
Publisher: Self
Review Posted Online: Jan. 25, 2023
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
BOOK REVIEW
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...
A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.
Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”
A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016
ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6
Page Count: 248
Publisher: Random House
Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015
PERSPECTIVES
A philosophically rich critique of state violence and mass apathy.
An Egyptian Canadian journalist writes searchingly of this time of war.
“Rules, conventions, morals, reality itself: all exist so long as their existence is convenient to the preservation of power.” So writes El Akkad, who goes on to state that one of the demands of modern power is that those subject to it must imagine that some group of people somewhere are not fully human. El Akkad’s pointed example is Gaza, the current destruction of which, he writes, is causing millions of people around the world to examine the supposedly rules-governed, democratic West and declare, “I want nothing to do with this.” El Akkad, author of the novel American War (2017), discerns hypocrisy and racism in the West’s defense of Ukraine and what he views as indifference toward the Palestinian people. No stranger to war zones himself—El Akkad was a correspondent in Afghanistan and Iraq—he writes with grim matter-of-factness about murdered children, famine, and the deliberate targeting of civilians. With no love for Zionism lost, he offers an equally harsh critique of Hamas, yet another one of the “entities obsessed with violence as an ethos, brutal in their treatment of minority groups who in their view should not exist, and self-decreed to be the true protectors of an entire religion.” Taking a global view, El Akkad, who lives in the U.S., finds almost every government and society wanting, and not least those, he says, that turn away and pretend not to know, behavior that we’ve seen before and that, in the spirit of his title, will one day be explained away until, in the end, it comes down to “a quiet unheard reckoning in the winter of life between the one who said nothing, did nothing, and their own soul.”
A philosophically rich critique of state violence and mass apathy.Pub Date: Feb. 25, 2025
ISBN: 9780593804148
Page Count: 224
Publisher: Knopf
Review Posted Online: Dec. 14, 2024
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2025
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
