Next book

NO GOOD DEED

Haste Ye Back, Manda Scott.

Among the many fine thrillers played out against the rugged Scottish Highlands, No Good Deed scores as one of the best.

Nine-year-old Jamie Buchanan watches in silent horror as a sting in a Glasgow tenement veers out of control. Across the room Sandra Smith fires away at three men who would kill her and the boy. The boy’s mother, a prostitute, lies dead, as does Sandra’s lover Luke. But minus a tart’s wig and makeup, Sandra is actually Orla McLeod working undercover with Murdo Cameron to trap Tord Svensen, a Bill Sykes for the new millennium. The reasons why Cameron and McLeod want Svensen, and the nature of their undercover work in Scotland, emerge only gradually in the cannily plotted tale. (Scott follows the Hitchcock rule of suspense: reveal the villain at once, his motives at last.) Their cover blown in the botched operation, Cameron, McLeod, and the boy head north by northwest for the snowy Highlands, which Scott renders in keen, lovely detail. On the coast, they shelter with Orla’s mother, who bears her own brutal past: the civil strife in Ireland took the lives of her husband and son, destroyed her career, and left her and Orla physically scarred. Relaxing the pace during this Highland idyll, Scott deepens characterizations. Orla contemplates her double nature, one half-warm by the cottage hearth, the other half-desperate to wrap the case in Glasgow, even if it means going there without cover. Orla, of course, gives in to the latter. Perhaps predictably, while she’s away, the child is kidnapped at gunpoint. Then, back on the site of the sting, Orla confronts a series of reversals as tricky and deadly as a North Sea gale. An epilogue finds Orla, Murdo, and the boy warmly united, the tale’s underlying moral and political issues perhaps forever unsettled.

Haste Ye Back, Manda Scott.

Pub Date: April 30, 2002

ISBN: 0-553-80267-4

Page Count: 306

Publisher: Bantam

Review Posted Online: June 24, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2002

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 234


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 234


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 37


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 37


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview