An informed analysis of one of the insidious elements of technology.

MORE THAN A GLITCH

CONFRONTING RACE, GENDER, AND ABILITY BIAS IN TECH

A sharp rebuke of technochauvinism.

Broussard brings her perspective as a multiracial woman, data journalist, and computer scientist to an eye-opening critique of racism, sexism, and ableism in technology. She decries technochauvinism, which she defines as “a kind of bias that considers computational solutions to be superior to all other solutions.” Examining the use of AI programs in areas such as facial recognition, learning assessment, and medical diagnosis, Broussard argues persuasively that algorithmic systems “often act in racist ways because they are built using training data that reflects racist actions or policies.” Moreover, these systems have been developed by “able-bodied, white, cis-gender, American men” who test programs on a similar pool. Racial bias is blatant when facial recognition programs are instituted in policing, leading to harassment and false arrests. “Facial recognition is known to work better on people with light skin than dark skin,” she writes, “better on men than on women, and it routinely misgenders trans, nonbinary, or gender nonconforming people.” Broussard explains clearly how data sets limit the efficacy of AI in predictive policing—“a strategy that uses statistics to predict future crimes”—as well as in medical diagnostics: “The skin cancer AIs are likely to work only on light skin because that’s what is in the training data.” The author draws on her own experience with breast cancer to point out the inadequacy of an AI assessment that missed her disease. Fortunately, her experienced doctor did not even consult the AI results. Broussard highlights the work of the Algorithmic Justice League, the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, and other groups involved in algorithmic auditing. “If we are building AI systems that intervene in people’s lives,” she warns, “we need to maintain and inspect and replace the systems the same way we maintain and inspect and replace bridges and roads.”

An informed analysis of one of the insidious elements of technology.

Pub Date: March 14, 2023

ISBN: 9780262047654

Page Count: 240

Publisher: MIT Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 6, 2023

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 1, 2023

Did you like this book?

Even if they're pie-in-the-sky exercises, Sanders’ pitched arguments bear consideration by nonbillionaires.

IT'S OK TO BE ANGRY ABOUT CAPITALISM

Everyone’s favorite avuncular socialist sends up a rousing call to remake the American way of doing business.

“In the twenty-first century we can end the vicious dog-eat-dog economy in which the vast majority struggle to survive,” writes Sanders, “while a handful of billionaires have more wealth than they could spend in a thousand lifetimes.” With that statement, the author updates an argument as old as Marx and Proudhon. In a nice play on words, he condemns “the uber-capitalist system under which we live,” showing how it benefits only the slimmest slice of the few while imposing undue burdens on everyone else. Along the way, Sanders notes that resentment over this inequality was powerful fuel for the disastrous Trump administration, since the Democratic Party thoughtlessly largely abandoned underprivileged voters in favor of “wealthy campaign contributors and the ‘beautiful people.’ ” The author looks squarely at Jeff Bezos, whose company “paid nothing in federal income taxes in 2017 and 2018.” Indeed, writes Sanders, “Bezos is the embodiment of the extreme corporate greed that shapes our times.” Aside from a few passages putting a face to avarice, Sanders lays forth a well-reasoned platform of programs to retool the American economy for greater equity, including investment in education and taking seriously a progressive (in all senses) corporate and personal taxation system to make the rich pay their fair share. In the end, he urges, “We must stop being afraid to call out capitalism and demand fundamental change to a corrupt and rigged system.” One wonders if this firebrand of a manifesto is the opening gambit in still another Sanders run for the presidency. If it is, well, the plutocrats might want to take cover for the duration.

Even if they're pie-in-the-sky exercises, Sanders’ pitched arguments bear consideration by nonbillionaires.

Pub Date: Feb. 21, 2023

ISBN: 9780593238714

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Crown

Review Posted Online: Feb. 21, 2023

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2023

Did you like this book?

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

GOOD ECONOMICS FOR HARD TIMES

“Quality of life means more than just consumption”: Two MIT economists urge that a smarter, more politically aware economics be brought to bear on social issues.

It’s no secret, write Banerjee and Duflo (co-authors: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way To Fight Global Poverty, 2011), that “we seem to have fallen on hard times.” Immigration, trade, inequality, and taxation problems present themselves daily, and they seem to be intractable. Economics can be put to use in figuring out these big-issue questions. Data can be adduced, for example, to answer the question of whether immigration tends to suppress wages. The answer: “There is no evidence low-skilled migration to rich countries drives wage and employment down for the natives.” In fact, it opens up opportunities for those natives by freeing them to look for better work. The problem becomes thornier when it comes to the matter of free trade; as the authors observe, “left-behind people live in left-behind places,” which explains why regional poverty descended on Appalachia when so many manufacturing jobs left for China in the age of globalism, leaving behind not just left-behind people but also people ripe for exploitation by nationalist politicians. The authors add, interestingly, that the same thing occurred in parts of Germany, Spain, and Norway that fell victim to the “China shock.” In what they call a “slightly technical aside,” they build a case for addressing trade issues not with trade wars but with consumption taxes: “It makes no sense to ask agricultural workers to lose their jobs just so steelworkers can keep theirs, which is what tariffs accomplish.” Policymakers might want to consider such counsel, especially when it is coupled with the observation that free trade benefits workers in poor countries but punishes workers in rich ones.

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

Pub Date: Nov. 12, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-61039-950-0

Page Count: 432

Publisher: PublicAffairs

Review Posted Online: Aug. 29, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019

Did you like this book?

more