Conservatively speaking, O’Rourke’s current patchwork is not up to his previous entries. But as Dave Barry’s goofy, evil...
O’Rourke (Eat the Rich, 1998, etc.), sharpest of the right-wing comic writers—not a populous gang, to be sure—this time stays at home to deliver his caustic, frequently malevolent commentary.
The stock characters who help the this domestic Republican Dagwood launch miscellaneous brickbats at “dupes,” “bakeheads,” “nooky-moochers,” “hair farmers,” “bird-brains,” and a “hay-breath” include a clever spouse, assistant Max, a couple of offspring, and a teenage neighbor. There are a dozen chapters with monthly headings, though there’s little relation to monthly events, in which O’Rourke unloads on disparate topics. Of course, there’s the UN, Social Security, and Third Way Economics (with help from the Cato Institute). There’s much ad hominem about the Clintons. (He alludes to the distaff Clinton as “that she-ape from New York State.”) There are digressions regarding drugs, booze, art, and business management as well as connubial and parental matters. For no special reason, there is also a long, patently recycled piece about India. Venice as presented in Las Vegas is preferred to the Italian original. He proposes a campaign for a politically correct cause (“Slogan: ‘Alzheimer’s—Fergedaboutdit!’ ”) and waxes kind of enthusiastic about cigars (though a beat behind the craze). Throughout, O’Rourke is as self-assured as any New York mayor, grandly dissing any ideology insufficiently libertarian. Sometimes it’s quite funny and sometimes, like the wine-tasting parody, it has no nose, no legs—it’s simply jejune. One natural target for any other professional political japester, George W. Bush, is never approached—but no surprise there. By the final entry, for August 2001, the rant is no more than bile.
Conservatively speaking, O’Rourke’s current patchwork is not up to his previous entries. But as Dave Barry’s goofy, evil twin, he’s still funnier than Pat Buchanan or Arianna Huffington.Pub Date: Sept. 1, 2001
ISBN: 0-87113-825-5
Page Count: 272
Publisher: Atlantic Monthly
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 2001
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
