Congressman Pombo (Rep., Calif.) and Farah (former editor of the Sacramento Union) mount a spirited, effective defense against what they argue is a determined assault on the very concept of private property in America by an alliance of elitist environmental groups, high-handed bureaucrats, and complicit lawmakers. Marveling that ``a society increasingly obsessed with rights, real and imagined,'' has become perilously casual in its approach to a prerogative free people have deemed inalienable, the authors assess the guarantees afforded by the US Constitution, notably the Fifth Amendment, which asserts that private property cannot ``be taken for public use, without just compensation.'' The authors go on to show how perverse judicial and legislative interpretations of the Constitution's Commerce Clause have undermined, if not erased, this guarantee. They also cite a wealth of outrageous instances in which federal agencies (the Army's Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, et al.) have run roughshod over the rights of property owners in the name of conservation or some other greater good, invariably at the behest of affluent, tax-favored organizations like the Audubon Society and the Sierra Club. In the meantime, Pombo and Farah assert, news-gathering enterprises that jealously guard press freedoms remain singularly uncritical of the eco-federal coalition's arguably dubious ends and means. On the plus side of their ledger, the authors discern a network of grassroots organizations emerging to resist further encroachment on property rights. In a concluding chapter, Pombo and Farah offer down-to-earth proposals for putting people first while ensuring appropriate levels of protection for creatures and habitats truly at risk. A manifesto that could prove the opening statement in an overdue debate on property rights and the ties that bind them to personal liberties.
Pub Date: Sept. 1, 1996
ISBN: 0-312-14747-3
Page Count: 224
Publisher: St. Martin's
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 1996
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis...
Privately published by Strunk of Cornell in 1918 and revised by his student E. B. White in 1959, that "little book" is back again with more White updatings.
Stricter than, say, Bergen Evans or W3 ("disinterested" means impartial — period), Strunk is in the last analysis (whoops — "A bankrupt expression") a unique guide (which means "without like or equal").Pub Date: May 15, 1972
ISBN: 0205632645
Page Count: 105
Publisher: Macmillan
Review Posted Online: Oct. 28, 2011
Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 1972
This is not the Nutcracker sweet, as passed on by Tchaikovsky and Marius Petipa. No, this is the original Hoffmann tale of 1816, in which the froth of Christmas revelry occasionally parts to let the dark underside of childhood fantasies and fears peek through. The boundaries between dream and reality fade, just as Godfather Drosselmeier, the Nutcracker's creator, is seen as alternately sinister and jolly. And Italian artist Roberto Innocenti gives an errily realistic air to Marie's dreams, in richly detailed illustrations touched by a mysterious light. A beautiful version of this classic tale, which will captivate adults and children alike. (Nutcracker; $35.00; Oct. 28, 1996; 136 pp.; 0-15-100227-4)
Pub Date: Oct. 28, 1996
ISBN: 0-15-100227-4
Page Count: 136
Publisher: Harcourt
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 15, 1996
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
