Next book

DOWN IN LAOS

HEROISM AND INSPIRATION DURING THE VIETNAM WAR

A riveting tale of war that stumbles a few too many times.

The lives of three very different men intersect on an aircraft carrier in this Vietnam-era military thriller.

At the end of 1967, the aircraft carrier USS Ticonderoga is stationed off the Vietnam coast. Onboard are Ogilvy Osborne, a former combat veteran, the ship’s chaplain; Lt. Augustine “Ti” Campbell, a hotshot aviator; and Lt. Robert Cannon, an up-and-coming staff officer. As Campbell flies missions over the Ho Chi Minh trail on the Laos-Vietnam border, Cannon is being groomed for advancement. The only problem: The FBI has taken notice of his fiancée’s anti-war activities at Columbia University. Meanwhile, the war is taking a turn for the worse. North Vietnam’s army attacks the city of Hue during the traditional Tet New Year’s truce then begins a six-month assault on the U.S. Marine combat base at Khe Sanh. Campbell is shot down and suffers horrific deprivation in a prison camp as he plots his escape. Cannon’s temper gets him in trouble with his superiors, threatening to derail his career. Ogilvy transfers to Khe Sanh to minister to the besieged Marines. The author of two previous military thrillers, Partel (The Chess Players, 2011, etc.) served on aircraft carriers from 1965 to ’68. The military details and dialogue are thus impressive, giving palpable authenticity to the story and the characters’ interactions. Partel illuminates not just the war but the internal conflicts of those who had to fight it, from religious doubt to social upheaval. The result is a ripping, visceral read. Unfortunately, the book is held back by some substantial defects. There are several typos and usage errors—e.g., “flaunt” for flout, “deport” for comport, etc.—and the military jargon is often overused and unnecessarily confusing. Also, Heart of Darkness took place in Africa, not the Amazon. More importantly, there is an overreliance on dialogue to carry some of the action scenes; more visual descriptions would better orient the reader. Finally, the religious inner dialogues of Osborne and Campbell often come across as stilted and unconvincing.

A riveting tale of war that stumbles a few too many times.

Pub Date: Dec. 1, 2014

ISBN: N/A

Page Count: 357

Publisher: Navy Log Books

Review Posted Online: May 1, 2015

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 674


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 674


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 199


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 199


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview