Next book

CHURCHILL'S GRAND ALLIANCE

THE ANGLO-AMERICAN SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP 1940-57

Charmley (History/Univ. of East Anglia) follows up his Churchill: The End of Glory (1993) with an account of the Anglo- American ``special relationship'' from 1940 to 1957. Winston Churchill, a Jerome from Brooklyn on his mother's side, cherished a sentimental attitude toward Americans. Besides his heritage, there was a fashion for woolly pan-Anglo-Saxonism during his young manhood. In his earlier volume, Charmley argued that the postWW II dissolution of empire was the result of the ``grand old barnacle['s]'' misguided sentimentalism. As Charmley points out here, Churchill tended to forget who won the American Revolution and that the Americans might have their own postwar agenda. Now he follows the so-called ``special relationship'' up to British efforts to pursue independent foreign policy goals in the Middle East, culminating in the 1956 Suez Crisis and the fall of the Eden government. Along the way, he drops some unusual opinions: The Russians really made the difference in WW II. The charming and opaque FDR bamboozled the Brits. Foppish Anthony Eden was a visionary. MacMillan sucked up to the Yanks for a financial ``fig leaf.'' To Americanor is it just modern?eyes he writes from a curious perspective of bitterness for Britain's lost imperial greatness. He claims ``that America wanted a compliant, non- imperial Britain as part of the European federation''which does not seem an especially unreasonable diplomatic goal. But behind Charmley's dropped-ice-cream-cone attitude toward imperial sunset is some of the most vivid, sharply analyzed, lively history being written. In a world full of faux iconoclasts, Charmley is the real McCoy. He is witty, informed, and less debatable here than in his last effort. Cuts to the chase and to the quick, as much as one can do either in modern English history. (16 pages b&w photos) (Author tour)

Pub Date: Oct. 1, 1995

ISBN: 0-15-127581-5

Page Count: 400

Publisher: Harcourt

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 1, 1995

Next book

WHO STOLE THE AMERICAN DREAM?

Not flawless, but one of the best recent analyses of the contemporary woes of American economics and politics.

Remarkably comprehensive and coherent analysis of and prescriptions for America’s contemporary economic malaise by Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Smith (Rethinking America, 1995, etc.).

“Over the past three decades,” writes the author, “we have become Two Americas.” We have arrived at a new Gilded Age, where “gross inequality of income and wealth” have become endemic. Such inequality is not simply the result of “impersonal and irresistible market forces,” but of quite deliberate corporate strategies and the public policies that enabled them. Smith sets out on a mission to trace the history of these strategies and policies, which transformed America from a roughly fair society to its current status as a plutocracy. He leaves few stones unturned. CEO culture has moved since the 1970s from a concern for the general well-being of society, including employees, to the single-minded pursuit of personal enrichment and short-term increases in stock prices. During much of the ’70s, CEO pay was roughly 40 times a worker’s pay; today that number is 367. Whether it be through outsourcing and factory closings, corporate reneging on once-promised contributions to employee health and retirement funds, the deregulation of Wall Street and the financial markets, a tax code which favors overwhelmingly the interests of corporate heads and the superrich—all of which Smith examines in fascinating detail—the American middle class has been left floundering. For its part, government has simply become an enabler and partner of the rich, as the rich have turned wealth into political influence and rigid conservative opposition has created the politics of gridlock. What, then, is to be done? Here, Smith’s brilliant analyses turn tepid, as he advocates for “a peaceful political revolution at the grassroots” to realign the priorities of government and the economy but offers only the vaguest of clues as to how this might occur.

Not flawless, but one of the best recent analyses of the contemporary woes of American economics and politics.

Pub Date: Sept. 11, 2012

ISBN: 978-1-4000-6966-8

Page Count: 576

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: July 16, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2012

Next book

A WARNING

Readers would do well to heed the dark warning that this book conveys.

The nameless resister inside the White House speaks.

“The character of one man has widened the chasms of American political division,” writes Anonymous. Indeed. The Trump years will not be remembered well—not by voters, not by history since the man in charge “couldn’t focus on governing, and he was prone to abuses of power, from ill-conceived schemes to punish his political rivals to a propensity for undermining vital American institutions.” Given all that, writes the author, and given Trump’s bizarre behavior and well-known grudges—e.g., he ordered that federal flags be raised to full staff only a day after John McCain died, an act that insiders warned him would be construed as petty—it was only patriotic to try to save the country from the man even as the resistance movement within the West Wing simultaneously tried to save Trump’s presidency. However, that they tried did not mean they succeeded: The warning of the title consists in large part of an extended observation that Trump has removed the very people most capable of guiding him to correct action, and the “reasonable professionals” are becoming ever fewer in the absence of John Kelly and others. So unwilling are those professionals to taint their reputations by serving Trump, in fact, that many critical government posts are filled by “acting” secretaries, directors, and so forth. And those insiders abetting Trump are shrinking in number even as Trump stumbles from point to point, declaring victory over the Islamic State group (“People are going to fucking die because of this,” said one top aide) and denouncing the legitimacy of the process that is now grinding toward impeachment. However, writes the author, removal from office is not the answer, not least because Trump may not leave without trying to stir up a civil war. Voting him out is the only solution, writes Anonymous; meanwhile, we’re stuck with a president whose acts, by the resisters’ reckoning, are equal parts stupid, illegal, or impossible to enact.

Readers would do well to heed the dark warning that this book conveys.

Pub Date: Nov. 19, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-5387-1846-9

Page Count: 272

Publisher: Twelve

Review Posted Online: Nov. 25, 2019

Close Quickview