Next book

THE HEART OF THE ASSASSIN

Pulpy and sometimes oppressively busy.

Ferrigno wraps up a dystopian trilogy set 30-odd years in the future.

As in Prayers for the Assassin (2006) and Sins of the Assassin (2007), North America is a battleground for multiple theocracies. Most of the Northeast has been obliterated in terrorist attacks, Seattle is capital of a moderate Muslim nation, San Francisco is an Islamic fundamentalist stronghold renamed New Fallujah, the South is a Christian outpost and Mexico has been renamed Aztlán in honor of its Aztec heritage. The author has plenty of loose ends to tie up, but the focus remains on Rakkim Epps, a one-time Muslim fundamentalist warrior eager to settle down with wife Sarah and son Michael. But thanks to some research by Sarah, a scholar of American culture, he heads to a wrecked and heavily irradiated Washington, D.C., to recover a rumored piece of the true cross that might help broker a reunification of the Muslim and Christian states. How so? Well, it’s complicated, and the explanation only intermittently transcends standard speculative-thriller plotting. In a throng of undistinguished imams, legislators, thugs and other stock characters, the most engaging personalities are Malcolm Crews, a celebrity Christian holy roller leveraged by Islamic leader the Old One for his own purposes, and the Old One’s daughter Baby, a temptress who’s working her own complicated scheme involving both dad and Rakkim. The action scenes have plenty of gore and grit, particularly any moment involving expert enforcer Lester Gravenholtz and Graceland, which seriocomically propels the story toward its climax. But Ferrigno is so preoccupied with pacing and plotting (both skillfully done, granted) that he spends little time engaging with the religious differences that separate the regions he invents, and he offers hardly any commentary on the relationship between church and state that this series would seem to demand. He blows the opportunity for smartly imagined commentary on geopolitics in favor of a mildly entertaining game of Risk.

Pulpy and sometimes oppressively busy.

Pub Date: Aug. 1, 2009

ISBN: 978-1-4165-3767-0

Page Count: 400

Publisher: Scribner

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2009

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 532


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 532


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 119


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 119


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview