A decidedly minor contribution to history, but an entertaining read all the same.



Move over, Anastasia: there’s a new alive-after-death Romanov in town, and therein hangs a lively tale.

Troubetzkoy, himself descended from Russian royals, turns up a mystery nearly two centuries old: the putative death at age 48 of Tsar Alexander I, celebrated for having marched his army in the streets of Paris after having helped defeat Napoleon. Everything about the death is suspicious, at least in Troubetzkoy’s eyes. Alexander died in a remote Siberian outpost far from competent doctors and medical examiners. Renowned for his strength, vigor, and various appetites, he had been in apparently splendid health and spirits on leaving the capital not long before. Moreover, the body that was represented as his bore signs of the lash, something no tsar could have been subjected to. Not long after Alexander’s death, a preacher turned up in Siberia who comported himself with military bearing and seemed to resemble the tsar in many ways; this Feodor Kuzmich, though a mendicant starets (holy man), once supposedly received a shipment of two hundred pairs of white silk stockings from Paris—and Alexander was known to have suffered from recurring athlete’s foot. On such evidence, none other than Leo Tolstoy was convinced that Alexander was Kuzmich, and Troubetzkoy capably defends the same view. Why the subterfuge, the faked death to escape from the burdens of the crown? Well, Troubetzkoy suggests, Alexander could have been suffering from a guilty conscience for participating, knowingly or not, in the murder of his father, Tsar Paul, who had been courting Napoleon and who, in the words of Alexander’s brother Constantine, had “declared war on common sense.” From regicide/parricide to supreme ruler and holy man: an odd career path, perhaps, but one that nicely sustains Troubetzkoy’s tale.

A decidedly minor contribution to history, but an entertaining read all the same.

Pub Date: March 1, 2001

ISBN: 1-55970-608-2

Page Count: 312

Publisher: Arcade

Review Posted Online: May 20, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 2002

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet


For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Did you like this book?

Buffs of the Old West will enjoy Clavin’s careful research and vivid writing.



Rootin’-tootin’ history of the dry-gulchers, horn-swogglers, and outright killers who populated the Wild West’s wildest city in the late 19th century.

The stories of Wyatt Earp and company, the shootout at the O.K. Corral, and Geronimo and the Apache Wars are all well known. Clavin, who has written books on Dodge City and Wild Bill Hickok, delivers a solid narrative that usefully links significant events—making allies of white enemies, for instance, in facing down the Apache threat, rustling from Mexico, and other ethnically charged circumstances. The author is a touch revisionist, in the modern fashion, in noting that the Earps and Clantons weren’t as bloodthirsty as popular culture has made them out to be. For example, Wyatt and Bat Masterson “took the ‘peace’ in peace officer literally and knew that the way to tame the notorious town was not to outkill the bad guys but to intimidate them, sometimes with the help of a gun barrel to the skull.” Indeed, while some of the Clantons and some of the Earps died violently, most—Wyatt, Bat, Doc Holliday—died of cancer and other ailments, if only a few of old age. Clavin complicates the story by reminding readers that the Earps weren’t really the law in Tombstone and sometimes fell on the other side of the line and that the ordinary citizens of Tombstone and other famed Western venues valued order and peace and weren’t particularly keen on gunfighters and their mischief. Still, updating the old notion that the Earp myth is the American Iliad, the author is at his best when he delineates those fraught spasms of violence. “It is never a good sign for law-abiding citizens,” he writes at one high point, “to see Johnny Ringo rush into town, both him and his horse all in a lather.” Indeed not, even if Ringo wound up killing himself and law-abiding Tombstone faded into obscurity when the silver played out.

Buffs of the Old West will enjoy Clavin’s careful research and vivid writing.

Pub Date: April 21, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-250-21458-4

Page Count: 400

Publisher: St. Martin's

Review Posted Online: Jan. 20, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2020

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet