An uneven novel with a split personality, one-half of which is worthwhile.


In Sanders' debut, a late-in-life coming-of-age novel, a 33-year-old lawyer tries to escape the traumatic events of his childhood.

“I’m done with the past,” says Hank Anawatty. “I don’t think the past is done with you,” Hank’s friend Daniel Rosenthal replies. Readers meet Hank in 1987, during his first and only therapy session. He’s been fired from his job at a law firm for drinking, and his girlfriendhas mysteriously disappeared. When his therapist probes him about his childhood, Hank replies, “There is no relationship between that period of my life and my current problems.” However, readers later learn that Hank’s father has a terrible temper and is overly critical; that his mother died of Pick’s disease, a degenerative brain ailment, while he was young; that his first love dumped him; and that a childhood friend drowned in front of him. Still, Hank insists, “it did not affect me.” Yet his past keeps cropping up—even in dreams—and demands a reckoning. Sanders jumps between scenes set in 1987 and scenes further in Hank’s past; the latter are told in present tense, reinforcing the idea that those long-ago days are still very present to Hank. In fact, his past concerns feel more real and pressing: what will happen to Hank’s friendships when everyone parts ways for college? Will Hank find direction in life? Will he acknowledge his mother’s illness? The 1980s sections, however, are muddled by improbable legal cases, a subplot involving missing jewelry, and references to angels and past lives, among other elements.The only thing that truly links the various sections together is Hank’s stubborn refusal to acknowledge the emotional burden he bears; much of the rest of the action feels like filler, meant to ramp up the intrigue. Although many important events are only revealed in conversation after the fact, the scenes that Sanders does depict are well-drawn and sometimes approach moments of real insight regarding guilt and suffering.

An uneven novel with a split personality, one-half of which is worthwhile.

Pub Date: Oct. 20, 2017


Page Count: 284

Publisher: Amazon Digital Services

Review Posted Online: July 8, 2020

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Reader Votes

  • Readers Vote
  • 11

Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT

  • New York Times Bestseller


Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z (2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 10, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Did you like this book?

Assembly-line legal thriller: flat characters, lame scene-setting, and short but somehow interminable action: a lifeless...


Two defrocked Secret Service Agents investigate the assassination of one presidential candidate and the kidnapping of another.

Baldacci (The Christmas Train, 2002, etc.) sets out with two plot strands. The first begins when something distracts Secret Service Agent Sean King and during that “split second,” presidential candidate Clyde Ritter is shot dead. King takes out the killer, but that’s not enough to save his reputation with the Secret Service. He retires and goes on to do often tedious but nonetheless always lucrative work (much like a legal thriller such as this) at a law practice. Plot two begins eight years later when another Secret Service Agent, Michelle Maxwell, lets presidential candidate John Bruno out of her sight for a few minutes at a wake for one of his close associates. He goes missing. Now Maxwell, too, gets in dutch with the SS. Though separated by time, the cases are similar and leave several questions unanswered. What distracted King at the rally? Bruno had claimed his friend’s widow called him to the funeral home. The widow (one of the few characters here to have any life) says she never called Bruno. Who set him up? Who did a chambermaid at Ritter’s hotel blackmail? And who is the man in the Buick shadowing King’s and Maxwell’s every move? King is a handsome, rich divorce, Maxwell an attractive marathon runner. Will they join forces and find each other kind of, well, appealing? But of course. The two former agents traverse the countryside, spinning endless hypotheses before the onset, at last, of a jerrybuilt conclusion that begs credibility and offers few surprises.

Assembly-line legal thriller: flat characters, lame scene-setting, and short but somehow interminable action: a lifeless concoction.

Pub Date: Sept. 30, 2003

ISBN: 0-446-53089-1

Page Count: 406

Publisher: N/A

Review Posted Online: June 24, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 2003

Did you like this book?