Lauding the Senate as a tool of moderation and wise counsel is one thing, behaving moderately and wisely another. More...

THE LONG GAME

A MEMOIR

The Senate majority leader bares all—well, at least his fangs—in this account of a long career on Capitol Hill.

The long game: it’s a metaphor for life as well as politics. If one were not aware of McConnell’s actual performance in office, this modest memoir would be a source of Solomonic wisdom for politicians and good citizens everywhere—as, for example, when he details his opposition to a flag-burning amendment to the nation’s founding document, arguing that “no act of speech is so obnoxious that it merits tampering with the First Amendment,” and as when he urges bipartisanship, saying, “I believe that consensus among bitterly disputing parties is not only possible but a necessary condition for the tranquil flourishing we aspire to as a people.” Deliberative moments of this sort are fewer, though, than score-settling and scattershot complaints. Allowing that he’s usually portrayed as the villain of the piece, he has scarcely typed his name before lighting into his Democratic counterpart, Harry Reid, under whose leadership “the Senate Chamber frequently became little more than a Democratic campaign studio.” Thus it has always been, and thus it is now, but no matter: McConnell goes on to rehearse lengthily his hatred of the Affordable Care Act and fury over the party-line vote that brought it about, to say nothing of his dislike for the president and the “march of the Left” generally. Even with its affecting glimpses into real life—his overcoming polio as a child, for instance—McConnell’s book is too much an exercise in finger-pointing: the Democrats are “more rigorous about enforcing a rigid ideological code than Republicans,” those who opposed the Iraq War were “reckless,” and so forth. 

Lauding the Senate as a tool of moderation and wise counsel is one thing, behaving moderately and wisely another. More examples of such exemplary conduct would have been welcome in the place of the litany of grumbles.

Pub Date: May 31, 2016

ISBN: 978-0-399-56410-9

Page Count: 288

Publisher: Sentinel

Review Posted Online: June 8, 2016

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.

THE 48 LAWS OF POWER

The authors have created a sort of anti-Book of Virtues in this encyclopedic compendium of the ways and means of power.

Everyone wants power and everyone is in a constant duplicitous game to gain more power at the expense of others, according to Greene, a screenwriter and former editor at Esquire (Elffers, a book packager, designed the volume, with its attractive marginalia). We live today as courtiers once did in royal courts: we must appear civil while attempting to crush all those around us. This power game can be played well or poorly, and in these 48 laws culled from the history and wisdom of the world’s greatest power players are the rules that must be followed to win. These laws boil down to being as ruthless, selfish, manipulative, and deceitful as possible. Each law, however, gets its own chapter: “Conceal Your Intentions,” “Always Say Less Than Necessary,” “Pose as a Friend, Work as a Spy,” and so on. Each chapter is conveniently broken down into sections on what happened to those who transgressed or observed the particular law, the key elements in this law, and ways to defensively reverse this law when it’s used against you. Quotations in the margins amplify the lesson being taught. While compelling in the way an auto accident might be, the book is simply nonsense. Rules often contradict each other. We are told, for instance, to “be conspicuous at all cost,” then told to “behave like others.” More seriously, Greene never really defines “power,” and he merely asserts, rather than offers evidence for, the Hobbesian world of all against all in which he insists we live. The world may be like this at times, but often it isn’t. To ask why this is so would be a far more useful project.

If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.

Pub Date: Sept. 1, 1998

ISBN: 0-670-88146-5

Page Count: 430

Publisher: Viking

Review Posted Online: May 20, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 1998

Did you like this book?

The author's youthfulness helps to assure the inevitable comparison with the Anne Frank diary although over and above the...

NIGHT

Elie Wiesel spent his early years in a small Transylvanian town as one of four children. 

He was the only one of the family to survive what Francois Maurois, in his introduction, calls the "human holocaust" of the persecution of the Jews, which began with the restrictions, the singularization of the yellow star, the enclosure within the ghetto, and went on to the mass deportations to the ovens of Auschwitz and Buchenwald. There are unforgettable and horrifying scenes here in this spare and sombre memoir of this experience of the hanging of a child, of his first farewell with his father who leaves him an inheritance of a knife and a spoon, and of his last goodbye at Buchenwald his father's corpse is already cold let alone the long months of survival under unconscionable conditions. 

The author's youthfulness helps to assure the inevitable comparison with the Anne Frank diary although over and above the sphere of suffering shared, and in this case extended to the death march itself, there is no spiritual or emotional legacy here to offset any reader reluctance.

Pub Date: Jan. 16, 2006

ISBN: 0374500010

Page Count: 120

Publisher: Hill & Wang

Review Posted Online: Oct. 7, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2006

Did you like this book?

more