Better scanned on the website.



A hit-or-miss collection of Q-and-As, posed mostly to writers in the New York Times Book Review’s “By the Book” page.

Current Book Review editor Paul’s introduction is somewhat pretentious: “The idea was to simulate a conversation over books, but one that took place at a more exalted level than the average water cooler chat.” Well, Q-and-A sessions are hardly “conversations,” and some of the questions—e.g., “What are your reading habits? Paper or electronic? Do you take notes? Do you snack?”—aren’t even worthy of the snack machine, let alone the water cooler. Inevitably, there is a good amount of solipsism: When asked, “What was the last book that made you cry?” Richard Ford replies, “My own book Canada.” Some answers are wacky. “What book is on your night stand now?” John Irving: “I don’t read in bed, ever. As for the main character in my novel In One Person, Billy Abbott is a bisexual man; Billy would prefer having sex with a man or a woman to reading in bed.” Some are stuck in a rut. “What book is on your night stand?” Sylvia Nasar: “Two biographies of Frances Trollope.” “Last truly great book you read?” “The Widow Barnaby, by Frances Trollope.” “Book you wish you could write?” “I’d love to write biographies of Frances Trollope.” However, there are some choice tidbits, too. “Being a native German-speaker, Hayek strings together railroad sentences ending in train wreck verbs,” deadpans P.J. O’Rourke. Donna Tartt wants to have a dinner date with Albert Camus: “That trench coat! That cigarette! I think my French is good enough. We’d have a great time.” Still, for the most part, clinkers outweigh the gems. Lee Child and Arnold Schwarzenegger want Barack Obama to read Churchill; Colin Powell wrote for money; and Rachel Kushner avoids “books that seem to conservatively follow stale formulas.” There’s a tip to remember. Other contributors include Jhumpa Lahiri, Curtis Sittenfeld, Jonathan Lethem and E.L. Doctorow, among many other luminaries.

Better scanned on the website.

Pub Date: Oct. 28, 2014

ISBN: 978-1-62779-145-8

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Henry Holt

Review Posted Online: Aug. 1, 2014

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2014

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.


The authors have created a sort of anti-Book of Virtues in this encyclopedic compendium of the ways and means of power.

Everyone wants power and everyone is in a constant duplicitous game to gain more power at the expense of others, according to Greene, a screenwriter and former editor at Esquire (Elffers, a book packager, designed the volume, with its attractive marginalia). We live today as courtiers once did in royal courts: we must appear civil while attempting to crush all those around us. This power game can be played well or poorly, and in these 48 laws culled from the history and wisdom of the world’s greatest power players are the rules that must be followed to win. These laws boil down to being as ruthless, selfish, manipulative, and deceitful as possible. Each law, however, gets its own chapter: “Conceal Your Intentions,” “Always Say Less Than Necessary,” “Pose as a Friend, Work as a Spy,” and so on. Each chapter is conveniently broken down into sections on what happened to those who transgressed or observed the particular law, the key elements in this law, and ways to defensively reverse this law when it’s used against you. Quotations in the margins amplify the lesson being taught. While compelling in the way an auto accident might be, the book is simply nonsense. Rules often contradict each other. We are told, for instance, to “be conspicuous at all cost,” then told to “behave like others.” More seriously, Greene never really defines “power,” and he merely asserts, rather than offers evidence for, the Hobbesian world of all against all in which he insists we live. The world may be like this at times, but often it isn’t. To ask why this is so would be a far more useful project.

If the authors are serious, this is a silly, distasteful book. If they are not, it’s a brilliant satire.

Pub Date: Sept. 1, 1998

ISBN: 0-670-88146-5

Page Count: 430

Publisher: Viking

Review Posted Online: May 20, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: July 15, 1998

Did you like this book?

The author's youthfulness helps to assure the inevitable comparison with the Anne Frank diary although over and above the...


Elie Wiesel spent his early years in a small Transylvanian town as one of four children. 

He was the only one of the family to survive what Francois Maurois, in his introduction, calls the "human holocaust" of the persecution of the Jews, which began with the restrictions, the singularization of the yellow star, the enclosure within the ghetto, and went on to the mass deportations to the ovens of Auschwitz and Buchenwald. There are unforgettable and horrifying scenes here in this spare and sombre memoir of this experience of the hanging of a child, of his first farewell with his father who leaves him an inheritance of a knife and a spoon, and of his last goodbye at Buchenwald his father's corpse is already cold let alone the long months of survival under unconscionable conditions. 

The author's youthfulness helps to assure the inevitable comparison with the Anne Frank diary although over and above the sphere of suffering shared, and in this case extended to the death march itself, there is no spiritual or emotional legacy here to offset any reader reluctance.

Pub Date: Jan. 16, 2006

ISBN: 0374500010

Page Count: 120

Publisher: Hill & Wang

Review Posted Online: Oct. 7, 2011

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2006

Did you like this book?